What the provider offers

Inspired Film and Video is a Stoke-on-Trent based video production company with more than 20 years of operation, delivering training films, e-learning packages, healthcare explainers and animation, promotional and recruitment film, documentary-style content, multi-camera live streaming, social cut-downs, and accessible format variants including subtitles, captions, transcripts, Easy Read and British Sign Language versions. Clients include NHS trusts, universities, further education colleges, local authorities, construction, housing associations, heritage and tourism organisations, and corporate names including Siemens, Skanska and Bostik.

Who it may suit

This studio suits buyers whose learning need is fundamentally visual: procedural training, clinical and technical explanation, induction, or content where a well-made film outperforms slides. It is also a strong fit for public sector and healthcare buyers who need accessible format variants as a matter of policy, since that capability is described as standard rather than optional. The published price guide is unusual and gives an unusually early view of realistic spend.

Who may need a different type of provider

Buyers who need a complete interactive course with branching, scoring, reporting and LMS integration are looking at the wrong kind of supplier. Video is a component of a learning design problem, not a substitute for it, and a studio cannot provide the instructional design, the assessment logic or the LMS build. A buyer who needs a single supplier for the whole course should go to a custom eLearning agency or studio instead.

Capabilities and specializations

Capability is broadcast-standard multi-camera production, animation and motion graphics, live streaming to common platforms, and delivery of subtitled, captioned and accessible formats. The structural point worth noting is that a film is only finished when the accessible variants exist, and the studio treats that as part of the deliverable rather than an add-on, which is the kind of detail that often surfaces late and expensively in a procurement timeline.

Evidence supporting the key claims

The published price guide and sector-specific pages are the most valuable evidence here, because training video budgets are usually the least transparent part of a content programme. The guide is explicit: promotional and recruitment films typically from GBP 1,500 to GBP 3,000; larger multi-location and multi-output campaigns from GBP 8,000 to GBP 25,000 and above; healthcare projects typically GBP 3,000 to GBP 20,000 and above. Fixed-fee proposals scoped to the brief, no open-ended day rates, and a typical standalone project of 3 to 6 weeks including one review round.

Questions buyers should ask

  • Ask what a review round actually looks like and how many are included, since the published timeline assumes one. Ask who writes and approves the script, and whether the studio or the client owns that step, because this determines where schedule slippage originates. Ask which accessible variants are included in the quoted price versus charged as extras. Ask how the studio handles subject-matter accuracy in clinical or technical content, and whether it signs off on factual claims or merely on production quality. Ask what happens if a participant in the shoot is unavailable.

Limitations and uncertainties

Prices are guide ranges, not fixed quotes, and a brief that departs from the described shapes will be priced differently. The evidence is entirely first-party. There is no published information on turnaround for a large multi-location campaign, nor on how the studio handles live event coverage alongside project work. As a video house it does not address instructional design, and a buyer should pair it with a design partner.

Comparison with relevant alternatives

Against a full-service agency such as First Media or Hungry Minds, a video studio is narrower and cheaper, but you need a second supplier for design and build. Against Zubr, this studio is squarely in conventional video and animation with immersive work as the specialist's distinct proposition. Against RWS and TransPerfect, both of which also produce training video, the difference is that those two lead with multilingual in-market delivery, whereas this studio's evidence is UK-focused. The published price guide is the deciding factor for early budget planning.

Basis and date of the assessment

This assessment is based on published first-party information retrieved on 22 October 2026, principally the home page price guide and the healthcare sector page. No client interviews, project participation or private quotes were conducted. No numerical score is published, since a defensible scoring method with published weights has not been established. This is a research-based profile, not a recommendation.

Commercial relationships

Inspired Film and Video has no commercial relationship with the publisher of this guide. It is an independently researched editorial review, funded by the publisher's own research and covered by no sponsorship arrangement.

Evidence sources

Next step

Use our vendor evaluation checklist before you speak to any provider, including this one. It covers scope, quality, project management, security, IP ownership, accessibility, maintenance and commercial terms.

Open the checklist Send a project brief